This QuickTip explains why I now feel happier about using elements from Google Sites in my blogs.
Long ago (back in the late 2000's) there was a product called Google Pages, which people could use to make their own simple websites. It wasn't the greatest product that Google ever made (or purchased), and eventually it was retired, with websites made with Pages transferred over to the newer Google Sites.
Sites always seemed a bit clunky. It doesn't seem to have a huge number of users. And there are vastly better products for building more-complex websites, and for building simple ones (eg using Blogger to make a "real" website).
Now, I did use a Sites filing cabinet as the document-store for one of my sites that makes lyrics of certain public domain songs available in PowerPoint format. I chose it before Google Drive had been released, and when Docs was not nearly as good as it is now. And SEO does matter for this blog, so I came to appreciate that the link to a file in sites includes the file-name.
But I've always had a nagging sense that one day Sites would be retired too, and I'd have to move my files and edit all my posts to re-set the links.
Why? Well I don't have a crystal ball. But this recent post from the Google Testing blog talks about how they are into "dogfooding" and that Sites is one of the tools they do this with, to " host team pages, engineering docs and more"
Just to explain, "dogfooding" is corporate-jargon for using your own products. As in "eating your own dogfood". It's sometimes called "drinking your own chapmpagne" in companies that see themselves as a bit more refined, or "eating your own cooking".
Google's post is telling us that they are using Sites for building tools that they use in their own work. Most likely, they have a website built in Sites, which manages their plans for future Blogger development, and available only to people inside the company and working on the Blogger project.
So that makes me feel reassured that most likely:
Phew!
Maybe it's time to review my file-hosting approach again, or to re-visit Sites and look at their FAQs, home-page and support-community, to see what other Sites tools I might find useful.
How have you used Sites in conjunction with your blog?
Why SEO doesn't matter for lots of bloggers
What is Google Sites, and why would a Blogger use it
Sites always seemed a bit clunky. It doesn't seem to have a huge number of users. And there are vastly better products for building more-complex websites, and for building simple ones (eg using Blogger to make a "real" website).
Now, I did use a Sites filing cabinet as the document-store for one of my sites that makes lyrics of certain public domain songs available in PowerPoint format. I chose it before Google Drive had been released, and when Docs was not nearly as good as it is now. And SEO does matter for this blog, so I came to appreciate that the link to a file in sites includes the file-name.
But I've always had a nagging sense that one day Sites would be retired too, and I'd have to move my files and edit all my posts to re-set the links.
Why won't Google retire Google Sites
Despite my previous misgivings, I'm now feeling a lot more relaxed about Google Sites.Why? Well I don't have a crystal ball. But this recent post from the Google Testing blog talks about how they are into "dogfooding" and that Sites is one of the tools they do this with, to " host team pages, engineering docs and more"
Just to explain, "dogfooding" is corporate-jargon for using your own products. As in "eating your own dogfood". It's sometimes called "drinking your own chapmpagne" in companies that see themselves as a bit more refined, or "eating your own cooking".
Google's post is telling us that they are using Sites for building tools that they use in their own work. Most likely, they have a website built in Sites, which manages their plans for future Blogger development, and available only to people inside the company and working on the Blogger project.
So that makes me feel reassured that most likely:
- Sites won't be canned any time soon, or
- If Sites is turned off, Google will have a replacement tool which will provide the same (and better) features, and they will convert items now built in Sites to this better tool.
Phew!
Maybe it's time to review my file-hosting approach again, or to re-visit Sites and look at their FAQs, home-page and support-community, to see what other Sites tools I might find useful.
How have you used Sites in conjunction with your blog?
Related Articles:
File-hosting options: places to store files that you share from your blogWhy SEO doesn't matter for lots of bloggers
0 Komentar